[加评论] 页面有问题?请点击打印板-》打印版                  [推荐此文给朋友]
[博讯主页]->[大众观点]
   

中共党奴朝的自我幻觉产生的危险/陈凯
(博讯北京时间2010年3月16日 转载)
    Is China's Politburo spoiling for a showdown with America?
    
     陈凯一语: Kai Chen's Words: (博讯 boxun.com)

    
    陈凯博客: www.kaichenblog.blopspot.com
    
    Free market economy is only meaningful and beneficial to mankind when trade/exchange takes place among free countries. Trade/exchange of the free countries with a slave country under despotism like China is meaningless and harmful. It only increases the danger of war by strengthening despotism and tyranny through illusions. --- Kai Chen
    
    自由市场经济的原则只对自由国度之间的贸易交换才有意义。 自由国度与专制奴役的国度(如中共党奴朝)是不可能有自由贸易交换的。 这种出于幻觉的贸易交换只能是有害的与增加战争的危险的。 --- 陈凯
    
    “a Wolf in the World? you cannot feel at ease with a regime that still covers up Mao's murderous nihilism. He reminds us too that China has never forgiven the humilations inflicted by the West when the two civilizations collided in the 19th Century, and intends to exact revenge. Handle with care.” --- George Walden (ex-diplomat)
    
    “(中共党奴朝)是世界上的一只狼。 你决不能对一个至今仍在否认、掩盖与删除毛泽东虚无主义的大虐杀罪行的党政奴国有任何幻想。 毛的反人类罪行使我们认知到中国的人们从没有忘却过、或原谅(西方)他们在十九世纪时所受到的羞辱。 复仇/复辟(如德国在第一次世界大战后的心态)是中国的人们的首要动机。 世界应当警惕。” --- 乔治. 威尔顿 (前美国外交官)
    
    ----------------------------------------------
    
    The long-simmering clash between the world's two great powers is coming to a head, with dangerous implications for the international system.
    
    By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
    Published: 5:33PM GMT 14 Mar 2010
    
    US President Barack Obama shakes hands with Chinese ambassador to America Zhou Wenzhong on the Great Wall of China Photo: Reuters China has succumbed to hubris. It has mistaken the soft diplomacy of Barack Obama for weakness, mistaken the US credit crisis for decline, and mistaken its own mercantilist bubble for ascendancy. There are echoes of Anglo-German spats before the First World War, when Wilhelmine Berlin so badly misjudged the strategic balance of power and over-played its hand.
    
    Within a month the US Treasury must rule whether China is a "currency manipulator", triggering sanctions under US law. This has been finessed before, but we are in a new world now with America's U6 unemployment at 16.8pc.
    
    "It's going to be really hard for them yet again to fudge on the obvious fact that China is manipulating. Without a credible threat, we're not going to get anywhere," said Paul Krugman, this year's Nobel economist.
    
    China's premier Wen Jiabao is defiant.
    
    "I don’t think the yuan is undervalued. We oppose countries pointing fingers at each other and even forcing a country to appreciate its currency," he said yesterday. Once again he demanded that the US takes "concrete steps to reassure investors" over the safety of US assets.
    
    "Some say China has got more arrogant and tough. Some put forward the theory of China's so-called 'triumphalism'. My conscience is untainted despite slanders from outside," he said
    
    Days earlier the State Council accused America of serial villainy. "In the US, civil and political rights of citizens are severely restricted and violated by the government. Workers' rights are seriously violated," it said.
    
    "The US, with its strong military power, has pursued hegemony in the world, trampling upon the sovereignty of other countries and trespassing their human rights," it said.
    
    "At a time when the world is suffering a serious human rights disaster caused by the US subprime crisis-induced global financial crisis, the US government revels in accusing other countries." And so forth.
    
    Is the Politiburo smoking weed?
    
    I let others discuss the rights and wrongs of this, itself a response to the US report card on China. Clearly, Beijing is in denial about is own part in the global imbalances behind the credit crisis, specifically by running structural trade surpluses, and driving down long rates through dollar and euro bond purchases. No doubt the West has made a hash of things, but the Chinese view of events is twisted to the point of delusional.
    
    What interests me is Beijing's willingness to up the ante. It has vowed sanctions against any US firm that takes part in a $6.4bn weapons contract for Taiwan, a threat to ban Boeing from China and a new level of escalation in the Taiwan dispute.
    
    In Copenhagen, Wen Jiabao sent an underling to negotiate with Mr. Obama in what was intended to be - and taken to be - a humiliation. The US President put his foot down, saying: "I don't want to mess around with this anymore." That sums up White House feelings towards China today.
    
    We have talked ourselves into believing that China is already a hyper-power. It may become one: it is not one yet. China is ringed by states - Japan, Korea, Vietnam, India - that are American allies when push comes to shove. It faces a prickly Russia on its 4,000km border, where Chinese migrants are itching for Lebensraum across the Amur. Emerging Asia, Brazil, Egypt and Europe are all irked by China's yuan-rigged export dumping.
    
    Michael Pettis from Beijing University argues that China's reserves of $2.4 trillion - arguably $3 trillion - are a sign of weakness, not strength. Only twice before in modern history has a country amassed such a stash equal to 5pc-6pc of global GDP: the US in the 1920s, and Japan in the 1980s. Each time preceeded depression.
    
    The reserves cannot be used internally to support China's economy. They are dead weight, beyond any level needed for macro-credibility. Indeed, they are the ultimate indictment of China's dysfunctional strategy, which is to buy $30bn to $40bn of foreign bonds every month to hold down the yuan, refusing to let the economy adjust to trade realities. The result is over-investment in plant, flooding the world with goods at wafer-thin export margins. China's over-capacity in steel is now greater than Europe's output.
    
    This is catching up with China, in any case. Professor Victor Shuh from Northerwestern University warns that the 8,000 financing vehicles used by China's local governments to stretch credit limits have built up debts and commitments of $3.5 trillion, mostly linked to infrastructure. He says the banks may require a bail-out nearing half a trillion dollars.
    
    As America's creditor - owner of some $1.4 trillion of US Treasuries, agency bonds, and US instruments - China can exert leverage. But this is not what it seems. If the Politburo deploys its illusiory power, Washington can pull the plug on China's export economy instantly by shutting markets. Who holds whom to ransom?
    
    Any attempt to retaliate by triggering a US bond crisis would rebound against China, and could be stopped - in extremis - by capital controls. Roosevelt changed the rules in 1933. Such things happen. The China-US relationship is no doubt symbiotic, but a clash would not be "mutual assured destruction", as often claimed. Washington would win.
    
    Contrary to myth, the slide to protectionism after the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act did not cause the Depression. Trade contracted more slowly in the 1930s than this time. The Smoot-Hawley lesson is that tariffs have asymmetrical effects. They devastate surplus countries: then America. Deficit Britain did well by retreating into Imperial Preference.
    
    Barack Obama has never exalted free trade. This orthodoxy is, in any case, under threat in the West. His top economic adviser Larry Summers let drop in Davos that free-trade arguments no longer hold when dealing with "mercantilist" powers. Adam Smith recognized this too, despite efforts by free-trade ultras to appropriate him for their cause.
    
    China's trasformation has been remarkable since Deng Xiaoping unleashed capitalism, but as ex-diplomat George Walden writes in China: a Wolf in the World? you cannot feel at ease with a regime that still covers up Mao's murderous nihilism. He reminds us too that China has never forgiven the humilations inflicted by the West when the two civilizations collided in the 19th Century, and intends to exact revenge. Handle with care. _(博讯自由发稿区发稿) (博讯 boxun.com)
(本文只代表作者或者发稿团体的观点、立场)

博讯相关报道(最近20条,更多请利用搜索功能):
  • 美首席大法官:奥巴马将暴民政治带入美政体/陈凯
  • 对自由最大的威胁来自左翼大政府 /陈凯
  • “人民”、“大家”、、-- 浸满专制剧毒的俗用语/陈凯
  • 从胆怯、懒惰与混乱的“奴”到清晰、自由与无畏的“人”/陈凯
  • “来西方学反西方,用自由学灭自由”/陈凯
  • 自由谈/ 陈凯
  • 价值vs.伪价值-反皇权vs.反皇帝/陈凯
  • 摈弃“族群文化”,建立“价值文化”/陈凯
  • 哪儿有自由,哪儿就是我的家/陈凯
  • 对我所热爱的美国进一言/陈凯
  • 叶匡政:陈凯歌坏了《梅兰芳》的处子之身
  • 陈凯歌还是舍不得放下大师的架子/吴虹飞
  • 我的路--陈凯介绍(1-2)
  • 癌细胞与化疗 – 什么是死因?/陈凯
  • 九喻:篮球国手陈凯发起奥运自由长跑
  • 陈凯歌们的“身份移民”要告诉我们什么?
  • 我灵魂中的声音--在2008北京“奥运自由衫”全球运动的演讲/陈凯
  • 屎虼螂的颂歌/陈凯
  • 陈凯:《一比十亿--通往自由的旅程》自序
  • 陈凯力倡十一反毛日 台侨加入逐毛行动


    点击这里对此新闻发表看法
  •    
    联系我们


    All rights reserved
    博讯是畅所欲言的场所、所有文章均不一定代表博讯立场
    声明:博讯由编辑、义务留学生、学者维护,如有版权问题,请联系我们。另外,欢迎其他媒体 转载博讯文章,为尊重作者的辛勤劳动以及所承担风险,尊重博讯广大义务人士的奉献,请转载时注明来源和作者。